The SOP Format Debate
Loom has changed how businesses create training materials. Before screen recording tools, every SOP had to be written — a time-consuming process that produced documents most VAs found hard to follow for anything involving software navigation. Now, many business owners record a 5-minute Loom video and call it an SOP.
But video-only SOP libraries create their own problems: they're slow to search, hard to skim, difficult to reference mid-task, and inaccessible for VAs who can't play audio in their environment. The answer isn't to choose one format — it's to understand when each format is best and build a library that uses both strategically.
When Loom Video SOPs Work Best
Software Navigation and UI Tasks
If a task requires navigating a specific software interface — clicking through menus, filling out forms, using tools your VA hasn't seen before — a screen recording is dramatically more efficient than a written description.
Try writing down "how to upload a listing to the MLS" in text and you'll quickly realize it becomes a 30-step instruction manual with dozens of field descriptions. A 3-minute Loom video shows the same process in a fraction of the time with zero ambiguity.
Best for:
- Uploading files or content to specific platforms
- Navigating CRM or project management tools
- Using design tools (Canva, Adobe Express)
- Software-specific workflows (QuickBooks entries, MLS uploads, Shopify product listings)
Tasks With Many Visual Micro-Decisions
Some processes involve judgment calls that are hard to describe in text but immediately obvious when watched:
- "Format this table so it looks clean" (what does clean look like?)
- "Edit this photo until the lighting looks natural" (subjective visual standard)
- "Find contacts in the CRM that look like duplicates" (pattern recognition)
A video showing you doing the task — with your narration explaining your thought process — teaches reasoning in a way text can't.
Quick Reference for Infrequent Tasks
For tasks your VA performs monthly or less frequently, a video they can rewatch is often more useful than written instructions they may struggle to interpret alone. "Watch this before you do this task each month" is an effective training instruction for infrequent procedures.
When Written SOPs Work Best
Step-by-Step Checklists
For tasks your VA performs daily or weekly, a written checklist that can be referenced mid-task is more practical than a video they need to pause and rewind. Written SOPs support:
- Daily task checklists (morning routine, end-of-day tasks)
- Standard response email templates with fill-in fields
- Quality control checklists before submitting work
- Process flows with clear decision points
Best for:
- Any task performed more than twice per week
- Checklists with more than 5 discrete steps
- Processes where the VA needs to check off steps as they go
Policy and Decision Documentation
"What to do when X happens" is better as written text than a video. Decision trees, escalation protocols, and policy documentation should be written so they can be searched quickly:
- "If a client requests a refund, check [X], then [Y], then [Z]"
- "If you're unsure whether to spend from the account, always ask first"
- "If a shipping order hasn't moved in 5 days, send [template], then flag for review"
Written format allows a VA to search for a specific scenario quickly rather than scrubbing through a video to find the relevant moment.
Templates and Fill-In Documents
Written SOPs are the only way to deliver template documents, email drafts, and fill-in scripts. You can't replicate a functional email template in a video — you have to write it out.
The Hybrid Approach: Best of Both
The most effective SOP libraries combine both formats for the same task:
- Loom video — Demonstrates the full task with narration (reference for initial training)
- Written checklist — Extracts the key steps for daily reference without rewatching
This approach gives VAs the full context of a video explanation plus the practical efficiency of a written checklist they can use mid-task. Creating both might sound like double the work, but in practice it takes only 20–30 extra minutes: record the Loom first, then write the key steps from your own narration.
Comparing Video vs. Written SOPs
| Factor | Loom Video | Written SOP |
|---|---|---|
| Creation time | Fast (real-time recording) | Slower (requires writing) |
| Visual clarity | High | Low (for UI tasks) |
| Searchability | Low | High |
| Mid-task usability | Low (requires playback) | High (scannable) |
| Accessibility | Requires audio/screen access | Works anywhere |
| Updatability | Requires re-recording | Easy to edit |
| Best for | Visual/software tasks | Checklists, policies, templates |
Practical Tips for Building Your SOP Library
For Loom SOPs:
- Keep recordings under 10 minutes; split longer processes into separate videos
- Always narrate your decision-making, not just your actions ("I'm choosing this because...")
- Include a brief summary at the start: "In this video, I'll show you how to [X]"
- Use Loom's timestamp feature to create chapter markers for easier navigation
- Store all videos in a shared folder with consistent naming:
[TaskName]_SOP_[Date]
For Written SOPs:
- Use numbered steps (not paragraphs)
- Include screenshots for any step that involves a specific UI element
- Add a "quality checklist" at the bottom so VAs can self-verify their work
- Include "common mistakes" to prevent predictable errors
For teams ready to organize all their SOPs in one place, see our guide on building a VA training wiki using Notion, Confluence, or Trainual for the storage and organization layer.
Ready to Hire?
Whether you prefer Loom recordings or written documents, having a solid SOP library before your VA starts makes the difference between a productive first week and a frustrating one. Ready to hire a virtual assistant? Virtual Assistant VA connects you with trained VAs who can follow your SOPs and help build new ones — so your team improves with every process you document.